Most Voters Are Against Going ‘Nuclear’ on the Filibuster

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Tuesday reiterated his belief that the Senate should meet a filibuster-proof threshold to confirm President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, and a new poll shows most Americans agree.

A new Morning Consult/POLITICO survey found 59 percent of registered voters believe Supreme Court nominees, such as Trump’s pick, Judge Neil Gorsuch, should be required to receive 60 votes to be confirmed. The sentiment was strongest among Democrats (72 percent of them), but the view is also shared by 45 percent of Republicans. Just 15 percent of respondents said SCOTUS nominees should not require 60 votes.

Related: Trump’s Approval Rating Slides Despite Support for Travel Ban

Speaking with reporters Tuesday after meeting with Gorsuch at the Capitol, the New York Democrat said Trump’s nominee was “clearly a very smart, polite and capable man.” But, he accused him of not being forthcoming and said that at a time when Trump has criticized the judicial system, “the bar for a Supreme Court nominee to prove they can be independent has never been higher.”

Republican leaders have threatened to go “nuclear” and eliminate the 60-vote threshold that remains for Supreme Court nominees if Democrats block Gorsuch’s nomination. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told Morning Consult he would get Trump’s nominee across the finish line, whatever it takes.

Most voters want to keep the filibuster intact. Only 21 percent of voters said they agree the Senate’s rules should be changed, while 55 percent of them disagree. About a quarter of voters (23 percent) said they did not know or had no opinion on the Senate’s rules change.


“I’m hopeful the Dems will not filibuster,” said Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Thune of South Dakota. “This is a judge who by all accounts is extraordinarily qualified.”

Roughly 7 in 10 (72 percent) voters said they have seen a lot or something about Trump’s nomination of Gorsuch, a 49-year-old federal judge for the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Colorado, to fill Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat. A plurality (43 percent) of voters said the Senate should confirm him, and only a quarter said they were opposed. Republican support for Gorsuch, at 66 percent, is much stronger than Democratic opposition, at 44 percent.

In terms of ideology, legal analysts cast Gorsuch as similar to Scalia, albeit slightly more conservative. Democrats and Republicans agree – 46 percent and 47 percent, respectively – that he will make the Supreme Court more conservative, though about 20 percent of partisans say his presence on the court would leave it unchanged.

twitter banner-final-06

With the Supreme Court in the spotlight, wide public support remains for the court’s decisions on cases such as Roe v. Wade on abortion and Citizens United on campaign finance. Just 26 percent say those rulings should be overturned, and more than half of voters (56 percent) said Roe v. Wade should not be overturned.

Support is much narrower for the recent Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision. While 39 percent of Americans support keeping it in place, 35 percent say the court should overturn the ruling, which ruled that closely held corporations could cite religious objections to the federal health care law.

The national poll surveyed 2,070 registered voters from Feb. 2 through Feb. 4. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.


Washington Brief: Most Voters Say Trump Jr.’s Meeting With Russian Attorney Was Inappropriate

Fifty-two percent of registered voters said in a new poll that a June 2016 meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a Kremlin-linked attorney was inappropriate. When voters were told the meeting was set up so that the lawyer “could allegedly provide official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary Clinton,” support for the meeting increased to 28 percent, from 23 percent.

Washington Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

President Donald Trump defended his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., after it was revealed that in June 2016 he met with a Russian lawyer who has ties to the Kremlin. The meeting came after he was led to believe the lawyer would provide damaging information about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and that the information was part of the Russian government’s effort to assist his father’s presidential campaign. The meeting included a Russian-American lawyer who’s a former Russian intelligence officer

Washington Brief: Trump Says He Didn’t Learn of Son’s Meeting With Russian Lawyer Until This Week

President Donald Trump said he did not hear “until a couple of days ago” about a June 2016 meeting between his son, Donald Trump Jr., and a Russian lawyer who might have had damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He also said he spent more than 20 minutes of his two-hour meeting last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin pressing him on election meddling.

Load More