House, DOJ Seek to Continue Hold in Case Over Obamacare Payments

The Trump administration and the House of Representatives are asking for a hold on a case over Affordable Care Act payments that has the potential to test the boundaries between the branches of government.

At issue is not just whether the executive branch had unconstitutionally funded certain ACA payments to insurers, but the limits on government power when it comes to appropriations.

In 2014, then-House Speaker John Boehner filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration, alleging the ACA’s cost-sharing reduction program was unconstitutional since Congress did not appropriate the funding. (The program helps people afford certain health care payments, such as their deductibles, copayments or coinsurance.)

A federal judge sided with House Republicans last year, and the Obama administration appealed. An appeals judge stayed any decision until Tuesday, after President Donald Trump was elected last year.

Now lawyers for the House of Representatives and the Department of Justice want the case to remain on hold, meaning insurers would still receive payments in the meantime.

Both sides proposed keeping the case on hold and giving status reports every three months, beginning May 22, 2017, according to a joint motion.

“The House and Department of Justice filed a motion seeking more time to continue efforts to resolve the lawsuit without the court’s assistance,” Doug Andres, a spokesman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, said in an email.

It’s possible that Republicans may end up funding the cost-sharing reduction program temporarily under the Trump administration, even though they protested the program when Obama was in charge.

That’s because insurers want more certainty about these payments as they decide whether to participate in ACA exchanges next year. Marilyn Tavenner, president and CEO of America’s Health Insurance Plans, told a Senate panel last month that the cost-sharing and reinsurance payments were “critical” to insurers.

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), the chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, has suggested funding the payments may be necessary for Republicans to ensure a stable individual market during a transition period away from Obamacare, as Republicans seek to overhaul the law. Even Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, has said he’d be open to funding the payments in the short-term.

Rep. Bill Flores (R-Texas) told reporters last week that House Republicans haven’t yet voted on whether to fund those payments, and he didn’t know how quickly the chamber might move on the issue.


Health Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

The Senate GOP’s working group on health care is still discussing how to craft a bill to replace the Affordable Care Act, but lawmakers are also focused on a short-term fix to stabilize the individual insurance markets next year. The fix needs to come before June 21, insurers’ deadline for deciding whether to participate in the exchanges for 2018.

Health Brief: House May Need to Vote on AHCA Again

There is a chance that House Republicans will have to vote again on their health care bill, which was barely passed by the chamber earlier this month. Speaker Paul Ryan has not yet sent the bill to the Senate because parts of it may have to be redone, depending on how the Congressional Budget Office estimates its effects.

Health Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

Senate Republican leaders formed a group to craft legislation that would replace the 2010 Affordable Care Act. The 13-man working group, which includes some of the most conservative members of the Senate at the exclusion of more moderate members, has faced criticism for not including women.

Load More