Privacy Advocates Aim to Use Defense Spending Bill to Protect Encryption

A bipartisan effort is underway in the House to use the Defense appropriations bill to protect the use of encryption in electronic devices.

Eighteen House lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, are backing an amendment to the Pentagon’s fiscal year 2017 spending measure that would prohibit any agent of the National Security Agency or Central Intelligence Agency from requiring or requesting a company or person to “alter its product or service” to assist the federal government’s intelligence operations.

The amendment, which is one of 75 slated for consideration on the House floor, would bar those agencies from mandating a company weaken or break its encryption to allow investigators to retrieve valuable communications. The U.S. government also wouldn’t be able to gather information on Americans using a provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments Act.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) filed the amendment, which has the support of Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.), John Conyers (D-Mich.), Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), Blake Farenthold (R-Texas), Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Raul Labrador (R-Idaho), Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), Ted Poe (R-Texas) and Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.).

Similar provisions were adopted in the fiscal year 2015 and 2016 Defense spending bills; both times the language was stripped from the omnibus bills eventually passed by Congress.

The House is expected to vote on amendments to the Defense funding bill, H.R. 5293, on Thursday.

Massie and Lofgren’s amendment has the support of the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Center for Democracy and Technology. Those organizations joined other advocacy groups in a Wednesday letter to House leadership urging them to adopt the amendment.


Tech Brief: NTSB Plans Vote on Cause of Tesla Autopilot Accident

The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board plans to vote at a hearing next month on the probable cause of a May 2016 car crash that killed a man who was using the semi-autonomous driving system in his Tesla Model S sedan. The incident raised questions about the safety of semi-autonomous vehicle systems that allow car operators to drive for long stretches with little human-vehicle intervention.

Tech Brief: Lobbying Tech Groups Target NAFTA Renegotiations

According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, the number of tech companies and trade associations registered to lobby U.S., Canadian and Mexican government officials has more than doubled in the last few months. Companies like Cisco Systems Inc. and Microsoft Corp. are looking to zero out tariffs for tech goods and remove restrictions on cloud storage as officials prepare to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Tech Brief: Intel CEO Leaves Trump’s Manufacturing Council

Brian Krzanich, Intel Corp.’s chief executive, joined the chief executives of Merck and Under Armour in announcing that he would leave Trump’s council on American manufacturing following the president’s response to violence during a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va. Krzanich said he resigned “to call attention to the serious harm our divided political climate is causing to critical issues.” 

Tech Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit will not block the Federal Communications Commission’s April decision to eliminate price caps for much of the business broadband market. The FCC’s business data services ruling deems certain local markets as competitive, even when there is only one broadband service provider.

Tech Brief: Benchmark Capital Sues Former Uber CEO Kalanick

Benchmark Capital is suing Uber Technologies Inc.’s co-founder and former CEO Travis Kalanick for not honoring the terms of his resignation and allegedly trying to stack the company’s board with allies to prepare for a return as CEO. The Silicon Valley venture firm, one of Uber’s biggest shareholders, alleges that Kalanick is attempting to “entrench himself for his own selfish ends” — an accusation a Kalanick spokesman called “without merit.”

Load More