OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Why Drug Importation Is Flawed Policy

With the issue of prescription drug importation being debated on Capitol Hill again, mark me in the skeptical camp. As a matter of safety and practical policymaking, drug importation simply doesn’t work.

It is not by happenstance that our country has the world’s safest drug supply. Counterfeit medicines are proliferating around the world and the people who do this are brilliant at making these products look just like the real deal.  According to Interpol, approximately 30 percent of all medicines in Africa, Latin America and Asia are thought to be counterfeit. While our relatively closed distribution system prevents these medicines from infiltrating our drug supply, those that make it in can cause significant damage to patients. From opioids that treat chronic pain to chemotherapies that treat cancer, there are too many instances of patients being directly harmed by illegally imported drugs.

Unfortunately, we don’t take counterfeiting practices as seriously as we should. A friend of mine recently purchased a new name-brand golf driver on the internet at less than one-third its retail price. It turns out that his “good deal” was a knock-off, skillfully made to look like the real thing but without the quality provided by the patent-holding manufacturer. Similar situations happen with all kinds of consumer goods; however, it is substantially more serious when it involves powerful chemicals that are ingested into one’s body. They are not one and the same.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates the manufacture and distribution of medicines in the U.S. throughout, and extensively along, the distribution chain. Importing drugs that are not subject to rigorous FDA standards and allowing them into the U.S. drug supply would be tantamount to eliminating current consumer protections. Even the real medicines would have no FDA testing for safety, and written materials, such as consumer information and warnings, might not be accurate. Undermining the security of our system with foreign drugs that may not have the same chemical or biologic makeup, may require special handling (in regard to temperature, light, etc.), and have not had their clinical data, labeling, or manufacturing operations reviewed by the FDA would constitute a mistake.

I’m one of many HHS Secretaries who found it impossible, based on the preponderance of evidence and data before me, to certify that importation of medicines from unregulated sellers is safe. In fact, my predecessors and successors from both political parties, along with multiple FDA Commissioners, have consistently found that drug importation carries potential dangers that can’t be ignored.

The FDA does not inspect or approve drugs that are intended to be sold in Canada. While our regulatory bodies can know whether a bottle of blood pressure medicine or diabetes drug originated in Canada or some other country, they need to be put in charge in order to do so. The “Canadian” medicines that Americans might purchase could come from China, Mexico, or other countries with extraordinarily high counterfeiting rates. Not surprisingly, Canadian officials are on record saying that they are not responsible for the safety and quality of prescription drugs imported into the United States.

The health and safety of our population is too serious a cost to pay in a misguided effort to achieve undocumented savings. When something seems as easy as looking outside the U.S. border for a solution, Congress should take a step back and assess why the people who have seen the consequences firsthand are steadfastly opposed to it.

 

Former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt served secretary of Health and Human Services from 2005 to 2009.

Morning Consult welcomes op-ed submissions on policy, politics and business strategy in our coverage areas. Updated submission guidelines can be found here.

Briefings

Health Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) pulled legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act on Friday afternoon after GOP leaders and the White House failed to cobble together enough support from the conservative and moderate wings of their party. In an astounding moment, the Wisconsin Republican conceded that Obamacare, which Republicans have campaigned on repealing since its inception, would remain the law of the land for the “foreseeable future.”

Health Brief: GOP Announces Changes to Health Care Bill

House GOP leaders made tweaks to their Obamacare replacement legislation aimed at bolstering Republican support, but many skeptical conservatives remain opposed to the plan. The changes include giving states more flexibility with their Medicaid programs, phasing out Obamacare taxes sooner and increasing tax credits to help older Americans afford health insurance.

Health Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

Speaker Paul Ryan’s Obamacare replacement plan got a boost Friday when leaders of the Republican Study Committee, the largest caucus in the House GOP, announced their support after the White House agreed to an amendment package that would give states the choice to block grant Medicaid rather than receive a per capita cap, and maintain work requirements for some program enrollees.

Load More