Protecting Intellectual Property Is Critical for Our Economy

At first blush, the recent dispute between Comcast and TiVo may seem to be nothing more than a feud between two competitors vying for a competitive edge in the free market. Closer inspection, however, reveals this dispute to be anything but a free-market clash – and the implications for U.S. consumers, inventors and even the future of the rule of law are at stake.

Americans can be forgiven for not paying much attention to the litigation between Comcast, the world’s largest (by revenue) broadcasting and cable television company, and TiVo, a technology company that licenses its intellectual property to companies like Comcast. But given the nature of the litigation and the possible effects on the future of patent protections, and the United States’ ability to maintain its global dominance as the leader in producing, manufacturing and protecting inventions, it is worth paying close attention.

TiVo, which recently joined with Rovi, invents innovative digital technology that is widely used – and enjoyed – by Americans. TiVo licenses much of its technology to cable companies and other broadcasting companies, which, in turn, are able to offer more enhanced and desirable products to their customers. Comcast’s services, in the absence of TiVo’s cutting-edge technology, would be a much less user-friendly TV-viewing experience. Take, for example, just a few of TiVo’s technological advances, such as the customized channel guide and the ability for customers to remotely access and program their DVRs. Forgot to set your set-top box to record your favorite show before you left for work? Thanks to TiVo technology, you can program it from your smartphone.

Strip out the TiVo technology, and Comcast’s customers would be watching and recording cable television the way they did back in the 1990s. Comcast, which trademarked its slogan, “The future of awesome,” would be decidedly less futuristic and so much less awesome without the embedded TiVo technology.

Which brings us to the ongoing dispute between the two companies.

Comcast, in an apparent effort to reduce costs, has decided it will no longer renew its license agreement with TiVo. But – and here is why TiVo finds itself in the midst of expensive intellectual property litigation with Comcast – Comcast has also decided to flout the laws and simply continue making, using, selling and leasing products that were built upon TiVo’s patented inventions.

Comcast’s flagrant violation of patent law is outrageously unfair – and, if unchecked, sets up a dangerous precedent that companies can steal other companies’ intellectual property. Patent violations are simply large-scale theft by another name, and must be treated as such.

Patents have a long history in the United States and our nation’s founders saw fit to include the protection of intellectual property in the Constitution. Article I, section 8, of the Constitution spells out that “Congress shall have power … to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”

And it was not merely the newly formed federal government that sought so ardently to protect intellectual property. Many of the states had already enacted, or would shortly thereafter enact, their own protections of copyrights and patents. Rhode Island, for example, offered that “there [is] no property more peculiarly a man’s own than that which is produced by the labour of his mind.” It is difficult to come up with a better or more concise reason why intellectual property is so deserving of protection – or why patents must be zealously safeguarded.

American inventors, whether individuals working alone to breathe life into their own idea, or teams of inventors working collaboratively for massive technology companies, share several attributes: They never tire of the pursuit of perfection; they are never satisfied with the status quo; and they are willing to pour their creativity and energy into their concepts. That process of shepherding a good idea from an intellectual concept to a patent-worthy product is painstakingly laborious. The genius of our patent system is that it recognizes – and, more importantly, respects and rewards – that laborious process.

Patents are more than certificates of ownership; they are inducements for inventors to give their time and energy for the risky enterprise of charting a new course. Patents are the single most important foundation undergirding the U.S. economy of inventions and spirit of entrepreneurship – and they are the reason most inventors are willing to undertake the hard work of creating.

Comcast’s willful disregard of our patent protections has consequences that will be felt far beyond the cable and broadcast television realm. Let’s hope that in the TiVo v. Comcast litigation, the International Trade Commission and U.S. courts continue to respect our necessary patent protections.


Jenny Beth Martin is the co-founder and president of Tea Party Patriots.

Editor’s note: This opinion piece involves allegations of fact that are in dispute and that are the subject of pending litigation before the International Trade Commission. Comcast has denied them in its filings in that case.

Morning Consult welcomes op-ed submissions on policy, politics and business strategy in our coverage areas. Updated submission guidelines can be found here.


Tech Brief: SEC Reveals It Was Hacked Last Year

The Securities and Exchange Commission said a computer system used for storing documents filed by publicly traded companies had been hacked last year. The cyberattack was first detected by the regulator last year, but the SEC said it had learned only last month that the compromised information may have been used in illegal stock trades.

Tech Brief: 3 House Democrats Call for FCC Investigation of Sputnik

Three Democratic members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee called on the Federal Communications Commission to investigate whether Sputnik, a news organization established by a Russian state-owned news agency, violated the public interest standard of its broadcast license with its radio show. Reps. Anna Eshoo (Calif.), Frank Pallone Jr. (N.J.) and Mike Doyle (Pa.) asked FCC Chairman Ajit Pai to follow up on a New York Times Magazine report that suggested the organization used U.S. airwaves to broadcast programming aimed at influencing the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Tech Brief: FCC Requests More Information on Sinclair-Tribune Merger

The Federal Communications Commission asked Sinclair Broadcast Group to provide more information on its proposal to acquire Tribune Media Co., a merger currently pending FCC approval. The FCC’s Media Bureau chief wrote a letter to Sinclair asking the telecommunications company to present further information about the size of its current audience, as well as the steps the company plans to take to stay below the ownership cap.

Tech Brief: Kaspersky Agrees to Testify Before House Committee

The House Science, Space and Technology Committee invited Kaspersky Lab Inc. co-founder and CEO Eugene Kaspersky to testify, along with other private and U.S. government cybersecurity experts, before the panel on Sept. 27, and he accepted the invitation — pending the acquisition of an expedited visa. The Moscow-based company, which makes antivirus software, is on the defensive from allegations it aids Russian espionage efforts.

Tech Brief: Judges Rule Uber-Waymo Case Will Go to Trial, Not Arbitration

A panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Uber Technologies Inc.’s appeal request for its legal dispute with Waymo LLC to move to private arbitration and ruled a public trial will proceed as scheduled in October. The court also ruled that Uber must hand over a crucial report for Waymo’s case that could hold evidence Uber stole trade secrets related to the development of self-driving cars.

Tech Brief: House Democrats Request Answers From Equifax on Data Breach

Led by Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), all 24 Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent a letter to Equifax Inc. CEO Richard Smith expressing concerns that it took more than a month for the company to reveal the massive data breach it said took place from mid-May through July, and about the scale and extent of the breach. The signers asked Smith to address these concerns prior to a planned hearing on the issue.

Tech Brief: Apple Expected to Unveil Premium Model ‘iPhone X’ Today

Apple Inc. plans to premiere the so-called iPhone X with a starting price of $999.00 at a 10th anniversary iPhone event on Tuesday, joining Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd in the market for luxury smartphones. In addition to the iPhone X, which uses infrared facial recognition to unlock the device, Apple is also expected to release cheaper models of the iPhone and an updated Apple Watch, with self-contained connect

Tech Brief: Two House Committees Call Hearings on Equifax Data Breach

Equifax Ltd. could be examined by up to three committees in the U.S. House of Representatives after a breach at the company exposed the data of roughly 143 million people. Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) of the Financial Services Committee and Chairman Greg Walden (R-Ore.) of the Energy and Commerce Committee announced hearings, and Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) called for an investigation by the Judiciary Committee.

Load More