DraftKings’ Competitive Edge: Where Participation Becomes Competition

Written by Morning Consult | Jan 21, 2026 6:35:47 PM

Leaders from the world’s largest companies, equity research firms, hedge funds, and the Federal Reserve rely on Morning Consult’s 30,000 daily survey interviews in 45 countries covering more than 5,000 brands, economic indicators, and risk metrics. Category Advantage measures the drivers of brand strength by capturing mental availability and emotional closeness among competitors.

Category Advantage measures the drivers of brand strength by capturing both mental availability (likelihood a brand comes to mind) and emotional closeness (how strongly consumers connect with a brand) among all competitors. Schedule a private briefing on this research. .

The bottom line up front  

  • DraftKings is the brand people think of when they want to compete, participate, and see how their call stacks up against others. The brand sits between FanDuel’s live-action focus and the more information-led positioning of Kalshi and Polymarket. DraftKings is most strongly associated with making money through participation, competing with others, and validating one’s judgment in visible, social ways.
  • DraftKings’ opportunity is not to narrow its role, but to organize its broad relevance around a clearer “competitive participation” narrative. The brand has many legitimate ways into memory. The strategic challenge is ensuring DraftKings is retrieved first across more entry points — not just eventually considered. Breadth becomes an asset when it’s anchored in a coherent competitive identity.

DraftKings’ competitive strengths:

  • DraftKings has strong, broad associations across competitive moments. The brand shows substantial CEP salience on: checking odds (55%), quick money (53%), bragging rights (50%), comparing predictions (47%), diversification (40%), validation (40%), knowledge-based returns (39%), steady income (38%), and real-time tracking (36%). This is broad relevance with competitive coherence.
  • DraftKings is strong on both sports and social competition. At 55% on checking odds and 50% on bragging rights, DraftKings competes effectively in live sports moments while also owning the social comparison space. This dual strength is a strategic asset.
  • DraftKings extends meaningfully into non-sports events. With 36% on real-time tracking and 40% on diversification, DraftKings has a foothold in event-driven and finance-adjacent moments — as long as those moments still feel participatory and outcome-driven.
  • The brand has a clear competitive personality. DraftKings’ associations reinforce each other: participation, comparison, payoff, visible outcomes. This gives the brand a coherent identity that can anchor growth across multiple entry points.

DraftKings' challenges:

  • Breadth creates retrieval competition. DraftKings is relevant to many moments, but being relevant is not the same as being retrieved first. The challenge is prioritization in memory — ensuring DraftKings wins the retrieval race, not just the consideration set.
  • Speed belongs to FanDuel. DraftKings should resist trying to out-compete FanDuel on “fastest” or “most live.” Its advantage is engagement and competition, not immediacy alone.
  • Analytical moments belong to information markets. DraftKings is less strongly associated with slow, analytical forecasting, interpreting complex news, or neutral information-first framing. These moments belong to Kalshi and Polymarket. This is a boundary to respect.

The core insight: DraftKings wins when people want to turn outcomes into competition. The brand’s mental sequence is clear: I participate → I make a call → The outcome resolves → I see how I did vs. others → I share or internalize the result. This sequence should be reinforced consistently in product, communications, and media. It differentiates DraftKings from FanDuel’s “act now” immediacy and from Kalshi/Polymarket’s “understand reality” positioning.

DraftKings' strongest segments:

  • Competitive sports bettors: Users who enter through checking odds (55%) but stay for the social comparison. DraftKings’ combination of sports strength and bragging rights (50%) makes these users a core constituency.
  • Social competitors: Users who want to see how they did vs. others, who compare predictions with friends (47%), who value visible wins and losses. DraftKings’ competitive personality resonates strongly.

DraftKings' opportunity segments:

  • Event-driven competitors: Users who track real-world outcomes (36%) and want to frame those moments as contests: “Who called it?” “How did you do vs. others?” DraftKings can extend into news-driven and cultural outcomes by framing them competitively.
  • Finance-adjacent participants: Users interested in diversification (40%) and knowledge-based returns (39%) — framed as competitive participation rather than analytical forecasting. DraftKings’ outcome-driven positioning is compatible.

Five strategic priorities for DraftKings based on this research

1. Clarify the core role: “where participation becomes competition.” DraftKings’ organizing idea is clear: you don’t just watch outcomes — you compete on them. This unifies sports betting, event-driven markets, knowledge-based returns, and social comparison. It should be the anchor for how DraftKings frames its role across the category.
 
2. Reframe non-sports events as contests, not forecasts. DraftKings already has meaningful association with tracking real-world outcomes (36%). Growth will come from framing those moments as: “Who called it?” “How did you do vs. others?” “Did your view beat the crowd?” This extends into news-driven events, cultural outcomes, and real-world developments without drifting into analytical territory.

3. Use social proof as a primary growth lever. DraftKings’ strong associations with bragging rights (50%) and comparing predictions (47%) are strategic assets. Reinforce the sequence: I participate → I make a call → The outcome resolves → I see how I did vs. others → I share the result. This is DraftKings’ distinctive competitive loop.

4. Be disciplined about speed vs. competition. Live moments matter, but they should serve the broader goal of competitive resolution, not just quick action. DraftKings should not try to out-compete FanDuel on immediacy — its advantage is engagement and competition.

5. Measure success through retrieval priority, not just breadth. Future success should be judged by stronger top-of-mind retrieval across both sports and non-sports competitive moments, growth in mental market share that outpaces penetration, clear differentiation from FanDuel (speed) and Kalshi/Polymarket (analysis), and a larger, more coherent associative network anchored in competition.

About this research

Morning Consult conducts over 30,000 daily proprietary surveys in 45 countries covering more than 5,000 brands and 50 economic indicators. 

Our category advantage research is aimed at understanding the needs driving consumers in your category — and how your brand can own more of them. This research is built on validated principles of brand-driven growth and powered by Morning Consult’s industry-leading sampling technology.

Measure the true drivers of brand strength

Capture both mental availability (the likelihood your brand comes to mind when consumers face a need or occasion) and emotional closeness (how strongly consumers connect with your brand), benchmarked against competitors.

Uncover Category Entry Points (CEPs)

Directly tied to mental availability, see the specific needs, occasions, and triggers that drive purchase decisions in your category, and how strongly your brand is linked to them.

Pinpoint growth opportunities

Direct investment toward the moments and consumer segments with the greatest potential to grow your brand.

Turn insights into action fast

Get survey results in 4–5 days through a centralized dashboard and short-form memo that equips stakeholders with clear direction on where and how to win.

Learn more