Digital Disruptors in Wealth Management: Brand Performance Analysis

Leaders from the world’s largest companies, equity research firms, hedge funds, and the Federal Reserve rely on Morning Consult’s 30,000 daily survey interviews in 45 countries covering more than 5,000 brands, economic indicators, and risk metrics. Schedule a demo to access the always-on consumer signal.

Category Advantage measures the drivers of brand strength by capturing both mental availability (likelihood a brand comes to mind) and emotional closeness (how strongly consumers connect with a brand) among all competitors. Schedule a private briefing on this research. .

The bottom line up front  

Six brands, six different origin stories, one shared position: they own the front edge of wealth formation. Together they hold 17% of the category’s mental market share — matching the Banks with Wealth Arms on half the awareness — and they build brand memory with the highest efficiency in the category. But efficiency has a ceiling. Robinhood matches Morgan Stanley on mental share yet carries the second-widest conversion gap of any brand in the category. SoFi has the most balanced profile but has not yet claimed a specific trigger. Betterment and Wealthfront are extraordinarily sticky among those who know them, yet almost no one does. These brands are built for accumulation and accessibility, not preservation. If they do not expand into retirement and life-transition triggers, they risk becoming feeder platforms for Traditional Powerhouses — graduating their most valuable clients to someone else at the moment assets become meaningful.

The Category Role They Own

They are the volatility and ease default. When markets move, when RSUs vest, when diversification becomes urgent — retrieval skews toward digital-first players. Frictionless onboarding, low minimums, intuitive apps, and transparent pricing map directly onto the psychographic drivers over-indexed among wealth management users: 75% pay a premium for convenience, and early tech adoption is a defining trait of this consumer base.

They capture early-lifecycle relationships. The banner data shows that consumers under 35 enter the wealth category through home buying (28%), filing taxes (39%), and starting a business (22%) — not retirement planning. These are triggers where digital platforms have natural alignment. Younger cohorts are building their mental maps of wealth management now, and the first serious financial relationship often becomes the default advisor later — if the brand expands with them.

In short: they own the entry ramp to wealth. The question is whether they can build the road beyond it.

Segment Snapshot 

Brand scorecard

Brand by Brand: Where Each Stands

Robinhood: Maximum Recall, Minimum Conversion

Robinhood is this segment’s most paradoxical brand. At 6% MMS, it matches Wells Fargo Advisors, Capital One, and Morgan Stanley — firms with decades of wealth heritage and massive distribution networks. Its 53% awareness is the segment’s highest, and its 47% likelihood to be selected leads the group. Consumers think of Robinhood when wealth triggers arise.

The Conversion Problem: But Robinhood’s -5.4pp gap — the second-widest in the entire 30-brand category after Fidelity — reveals what happens when recall outpaces trust. Consumers think of Robinhood for wealth-adjacent activities but are not converting that recall into full wealth engagement. The mental advantage matrix shows no CEP where Robinhood over-indexes meaningfully. It has mental share without mental authority. And its 2.7 emotional connection, while the highest in this segment, still sits below the midpoint of the 7-point scale. Robinhood’s trajectory is a leading indicator for the entire segment: if the highest-recall Disruptor cannot convert, the problem is structural — rooted in trust, not awareness.

SoFi: Best-Positioned for the Next Phase

SoFi occupies the most balanced position in the segment: 4% MMS, 50% awareness, 44% penetration, 2.5 emotional connection, and a -2.1pp gap that is narrower than both Robinhood and Wealthfront. No single metric is the segment’s best, but no metric is a liability either. SoFi’s diversified financial platform — spanning lending, banking, investing, and insurance — gives it more natural entry points into wealth conversations than any single-product competitor. A consumer who refinances student loans through SoFi, opens a checking account, and begins investing has already experienced three financial touchpoints before a wealth conversation begins. That multi-product journey is the kind of relationship-building that the category’s barrier data suggests consumers want: gradual, low-friction escalation from simple financial tools to comprehensive wealth management. SoFi’s challenge is that its CEP profile remains flat — no trigger where it over-indexes. It needs to choose: tax-season optimization tied to its banking base, debt-to-wealth transition planning for its core lending audience, or early-career accumulation for its younger demographic. The platform supports all three. The brand must pick.

E-Trade: Heritage Brokerage at a Crossroads

E-Trade holds 3% MMS with 47% awareness — the third-highest profile in the segment — but its 35% mental penetration is the segment’s second lowest, and its 5.6 network size is the narrowest. This is a brand that many consumers know but relatively few associate with wealth management triggers. E-Trade’s heritage as a self-directed brokerage gives it name recognition but may also constrain its mental associations: consumers link E-Trade to trading, not to life-stage wealth planning. Its 2.2 emotional connection is the segment’s joint lowest, and its -2.3pp gap sits in the middle. E-Trade’s strategic position is increasingly squeezed: Robinhood has taken the self-directed trading crown among younger consumers, while SoFi is building the multi-product platform that E-Trade never became. Morgan Stanley’s 2020 acquisition of E-Trade adds another dimension — the question is whether E-Trade becomes a feeder for Morgan Stanley’s advisory business or builds a distinctive digital wealth identity under that umbrella. The data suggests the former is more likely than the latter: E-Trade’s narrow network and low emotional depth do not support a standalone wealth positioning.

Request a briefing on your category's users

Ally Financial: Banking Roots, Disruptor Ambition

Ally occupies an interesting hybrid position: it originated as a digital bank, not a brokerage, giving it a cross-sell logic more similar to the Banks with Wealth Arms than to its Disruptor peers. At 2% MMS, 37% awareness, and 39% mental penetration, Ally’s national profile is modest. But its -1.3pp gap is the narrowest in the segment — meaning its mental share and market share are more closely aligned than any peer’s. This suggests Ally’s wealth users came through genuine consideration, not just platform inertia. Its 5.8 network size and 2.3 emotional connection are near the segment average. Ally’s strategic opportunity mirrors what the Banks with Wealth Arms should be doing but aren’t: leveraging deposit relationships, savings milestones, and mortgage activity as triggers for wealth conversations. If Ally can build explicit mental links between banking events and wealth triggers — the way Capital One has failed to — it could carve out a distinctive “banking-to-wealth” pipeline that neither pure Disruptors nor traditional banks have claimed.

Betterment & Wealthfront: Extraordinary Stickiness, Minimal Reach

Both brands sit at 1% MMS, which accurately reflects their national invisibility rather than their brand quality. Wealthfront’s 6.3 network size matches Robinhood’s and exceeds SoFi’s — meaning consumers who know Wealthfront associate it with a wide range of wealth triggers. Betterment’s 5.8 network and 2.2 emotional connection are near segment averages. These are brands with strong underlying mental architecture that almost no one has seen. Their -3.1pp (Wealthfront) and -1.6pp (Betterment) gaps tell different stories: Wealthfront is being used more than it’s being recalled (similar to Fidelity’s pattern, likely through employer and workplace channels), while Betterment’s tighter gap suggests more intentional usage. Both brands’ strategic bottleneck is overwhelmingly awareness, not positioning. Targeted investment in the channels where wealth consumers over-index — podcasts, professional networks, financial media — could yield outsized returns in mental penetration for these two brands specifically.

What Unites the Segment

The trust ceiling is the binding constraint. At 2.35 on a 7-point scale, the Digital Disruptors have the lowest average emotional connection of any segment. Even Robinhood, the segment leader at 2.7, sits below the midpoint. The dashboard’s emotional connection curve shows a clear relationship between emotional depth and share of a consumer’s total portfolio: brands below 3.0 consistently command thin slivers. These brands may be used as the “side account” for trading or experimentation, but they are not becoming the primary wealth relationship. As wealth grows and life complexity increases, the psychological need shifts from access to assurance. The brands that bridge from “easy” to “enduring” will capture compounding share.

CEP associations are broad but shallow. The mental advantage matrix shows almost no strong positive or negative signals across the 20 category entry points. Where the Powerhouses show dramatic spikes (Fidelity at +9 on retirement), the Disruptors show a landscape of zeros. Consumers associate these brands with the wealth category in general, but not with any specific life moment. In a category where consumers enter through distinct triggers, this generalist positioning limits the ability to intercept demand at the moment of decision.

Retirement and estate triggers remain unowned by this segment. Planning retirement (52%) and estate taxes for wealth transfer (27%) are the category’s largest and third-largest entry points. Neither is distinctively associated with any Disruptor brand. This is the segment’s most consequential structural gap: the triggers that bring the most assets into play are the ones where these brands are weakest. If they do not expand into retirement and life-transition territory, traditional firms will inherit their most valuable clients at precisely the moment assets become meaningful.

Competitive Context

How each brand’s position maps against the broader category:

The Strategic Imperative

• Robinhood must solve the conversion problem or become a case study. Its -5.4pp gap is the segment’s strategic challenge at the extreme. The path forward is not more awareness — it is building trust through visible guardrails in volatility moments, advisory access layers that don’t compromise simplicity, and “future you” planning narratives that extend the brand beyond trading into genuine wealth stewardship. If Robinhood cannot convert, the problem is structural for the whole segment.
  
  
• SoFi should claim the “debt-to-wealth” transition as its trigger territory. Its multi-product platform (lending, banking, investing, insurance) makes it the only Disruptor with a natural on-ramp from financial recovery to wealth building. Tax-season optimization tied to its banking base, student-loan-to-investing transitions, and early-career accumulation are all ownable positions that no competitor has claimed. The platform supports all three — the brand must choose.
  
  
• Betterment and Wealthfront should invest in awareness, not repositioning. Their mental architecture is already working — among consumers who know them, these brands stick more efficiently than any competitor in the category. The bottleneck is raw awareness (13–18%). Targeted investment in podcasts, professional networks, and financial media could yield outsized returns. Wealthfront could own automated portfolio rebalancing. Betterment could own goal-based planning for dual-income households.
  
  
• Every brand should claim “Estate Lite” before the Powerhouses fill the gap. Basic wealth transfer tools, beneficiary optimization education, planning checklists tied to life transitions — these are not complex advisory products, they are digital-native services that align with the Disruptors’ UX strengths. Retirement and estate triggers (52% and 27% of consumers respectively) represent the category’s largest entry points, and no Disruptor owns any piece of them. The first brand to make estate planning feel as intuitive as opening an account will shift the competitive dynamic.
  
  
• Convert ease into trust through milestone moments. Celebrate portfolio milestones. Trigger advisory outreach as balances cross meaningful thresholds. Build “future you” projections that extend the planning horizon from months to decades. The emotional connection data is unambiguous: every brand in this segment sits below 3.0. The path from 2.35 to 3.5 is not through marketing — it is through demonstrating outcomes beyond trading: tax optimization, retirement projections, intergenerational planning. The goal is to shift the brand promise from ease to endurance.
  
  
• E-Trade and Ally must differentiate or be absorbed. E-Trade’s narrow network (5.6) and Morgan Stanley parentage suggest a future as an acquisition funnel, not a standalone wealth brand. Ally’s banking-to-wealth pipeline is a genuine differentiator if it acts on it — but at 2% MMS, the window is small. Both brands are squeezed between Robinhood and SoFi above, and the Powerhouse digital platforms expanding from the other direction.
  

   

The core insight: The Digital Disruptors have captured the entry ramp to wealth. But if they do not expand their mental footprint into long-term planning and estate territory, traditional firms will inherit their most valuable clients at precisely the moment assets become meaningful. The opportunity is not more usage. It is broader association. The brands that evolve from “easy investing” to “lifelong wealth partner” will shift the competitive balance of the entire category.

About this research

Morning Consult conducts over 30,000 daily proprietary surveys in 45 countries covering more than 5,000 brands and 50 economic indicators. 

Our category advantage research is aimed at understanding the needs driving consumers in your category — and how your brand can own more of them. This research is built on validated principles of brand-driven growth and powered by Morning Consult’s industry-leading sampling technology.

Measure the true drivers of brand strength

Capture both mental availability (the likelihood your brand comes to mind when consumers face a need or occasion) and emotional closeness (how strongly consumers connect with your brand), benchmarked against competitors.

Uncover Category Entry Points (CEPs)

Directly tied to mental availability, see the specific needs, occasions, and triggers that drive purchase decisions in your category, and how strongly your brand is linked to them.

Pinpoint growth opportunities

Direct investment toward the moments and consumer segments with the greatest potential to grow your brand.

Turn insights into action fast

Get survey results in 4–5 days through a centralized dashboard and short-form memo that equips stakeholders with clear direction on where and how to win.

Learn more