Where the MLB Competes with the NFL

The bottom line up front

The MLB is the closest league to the NFL on the attendance and community occasions that define American sports culture. The brand’s strongest mental advantages — capturing disproportionate share of in-person attendance, hometown identity, and family ritual occasions — give it the most defensible competitive position in the category against streaming and attention competition. But the MLB’s mental ownership is heavily concentrated in older, White, suburban consumers, with a generational handoff problem more severe than the NFL’s and a cultural-relevance gap more pronounced than the NBA’s. The strategic priority is to build the next decade’s fan base before the demographic that sustains the current one finishes aging out.

In this briefing, we use the Category Advantage research framework. A few terms you should know:

• Mental Market Share (MMS) measures a brand’s "mental availability"—how often it comes to mind, compared to competitors, when consumers think of buying in a category
• Category Entry Points (CEPs) are the specific needs, motivations, situations, or feelings that trigger a consumer to consider a product category and the brands within it
• Network Size refers to the average number of distinct usage occasions or buying situations that consumers mentally associate with a brand

Where the MLB Stands

The MLB holds the third-place mental position, but on a different competitive axis. The MLB’s 10.6% MMS trails the NBA’s 12.5% by 2 points but represents a very different brand: 75% mental penetration among MLB-aware consumers (higher than NBA’s 71%, lower than the NFL’s 91%) with a tight network size of 11.6. THe MLB is more broadly recalled than the NBA but linked to fewer occasions — breadth without depth. Critically, the MLB’s gap to the NFL on attendance-driven CEPs is the narrowest in the data: the NFL leads “attending a live event” by only 5.1pp (41.4% vs. 36.3%) and “attending games with friends or family” by 7.5pp (44.6% vs. 37.1%) — compared to the NFL’s 20+ point dominance on most other major CEPs.

Emotional connection is the MLB’s weakest among the focal three — but not where you’d expect. MLB’s overall EC of 4.05 trails the NFL (4.52) and the NBA (4.16), but the segment skew matters more: Boomer men show 4.86 EC and Boomer women 4.75 — the brand’s strongest cohorts. Among 18–34s EC drops to 3.88; among Asian Americans it falls to 2.89, the lowest single-cohort EC score in any focal brand’s data. The MLB has the deepest bond with the smallest, oldest, and most demographically homogeneous slice of the category’s audience.

The MLB’s mental advantage profile is the most occasion-concentrated of the three. The MLB holds six meaningful advantages (+5 or higher) and three meaningful disadvantages (-5 or lower). The advantages cluster cleanly around live attendance and team loyalty: attending games with friends/family (+10.1), hometown teams (+9.7), playoff games (+8.2), favorite team in season (+8.2), attending live (+7.4), and licensed merch (+5.7). The disadvantages cluster around modern/global occasions: women’s sports (-16.7), international (-17.2), social-media discovery (-5.4). MLB is the in-stadium, hometown-identity sport — and the most absent from digital and global occasions.

The CEPs the MLB Owns — and the Ones It Doesn't

The MLB’s segment position is the most demographically polarized of the focal three.

Boomer consumers are the foundation. Boomer women show 17.8% MMS and 4.75 EC; Boomer men 14.0% and 4.86. The 65+ segment hits 16.5% MMS — the highest of any age cut. This isn’t loyalty inertia; it’s an actively-engaged generation that grew up with baseball as the cultural default. But this cohort is also the most exposed to attrition through demographic change.

The 18–34 segment is where the brand is structurally weakest. MMS drops to 6.1% — less than half of Boomer women — and EC to 3.88. Gen Z adults specifically show 5.9% MMS, lower than any focal cohort in the entire data. The brand still has 72% Mental penetration in this segment: younger consumers know the MLB exists but rarely think of it first.

Race and ethnicity reveal the most strategically urgent gap. Black Americans show just 5.1% MMS for the MLB (vs. 23.2% NBA, 21.3% NFL); Asian Americans 6.1% and a striking 2.89 EC. White non-Hispanic consumers show 13.0% MMS. This isn’t a marketing gap — it’s a multi-generational cultural-relevance gap compounding the age problem: the demographics gaining population share are the demographics least mentally engaged.

Northeast and Midwest hold the strongest regional positions. MMS reaches 13.5% Northeast and 12.4% Midwest — historic baseball strongholds with multi-team rivalries. The South (9.1%) and West (9.3%) under-index, despite both being large and growing markets.

What’s In the Way

The MLB’s friction profile is the most uneven of the focal three.

Live-event access is an asset, not just a constraint. The category’s ticket-price barrier (43% Total) hits the MLB less than the NFL because MLB pricing is structurally lower and inventory higher. Where rural consumers cite “live events are too far” 9 points above category average, the MLB has more leverage than any league to address it via minor-league affiliations, regional broadcast investment, and accessible stadium experiences.

The cultural-relevance gap is the hardest barrier. The 5.1% MMS among Black Americans, 6.1% among Asian Americans, and 5.9% among Gen Z aren’t friction problems — they’re brand-meaning problems. Reactivation doesn’t work on consumers who never built an initial connection. The lever is youth and community programming, MLB-affiliated content in non-traditional cultural spaces, and athlete-personality marketing that competes with the NBA’s structural cultural ownership.

Pace-of-play and broadcast format remain real constraints with younger audiences. The brand has made structural changes (pitch clock, base sizing) but discovery and habit-formation friction shows up in a -5.4 social-media disadvantage and weak performance on “looking for an exciting live game to watch” (-0.4; NFL +3.4). Younger consumers don’t experience baseball as the inherently exciting product older fans do.

What to Do About It

Lean into the live-event moat. MLB’s cluster of attendance-and-community advantages is the most defensible occasion ownership in American sports against streaming and shortening attention spans. Premium stadium experiences, family-bundle pricing, regional minor-league integration, and rivalry-game packaging compound existing advantage rather than competing with the NFL on territory the MLB cannot win.

Solve the cultural-relevance gap with a generational horizon. The Black and Asian-American MMS gaps cannot be closed by Heritage Month marketing; they require multi-year community investment, athlete-driven content programs, and youth-development partnerships that build mental availability before the next cohort hits adulthood. This is the single most consequential strategic priority in the data.

Build a credible fantasy and betting position. The -2.4 disadvantage matters because that CEP is the on-ramp for Millennial men — the demographic with the largest current-to-potential MMS gap. The NBA and the NFL are investing here aggressively. Without a credible position, the MLB risks ceding the next male cohort entirely.

Make the rivalry calendar a marketed asset. The +4.4 advantage and 38.1% raw association on rivalry games are underleveraged. National-broadcast rivalry windows, retro uniform partnerships, and integrated storytelling across regional sports networks turn a structural asset into commercial value.

About this research

Morning Consult conducts over 30,000 daily proprietary surveys in 45 countries covering more than 5,000 brands and 50 economic indicators. 

Our category advantage research is aimed at understanding the needs driving consumers in your category — and how your brand can own more of them. This research is built on validated principles of brand-driven growth and powered by Morning Consult’s industry-leading sampling technology.

Measure the true drivers of brand strength

Capture both mental availability (the likelihood your brand comes to mind when consumers face a need or occasion) and emotional closeness (how strongly consumers connect with your brand), benchmarked against competitors.

Uncover Category Entry Points (CEPs)

Directly tied to mental availability, see the specific needs, occasions, and triggers that drive purchase decisions in your category, and how strongly your brand is linked to them.

Pinpoint growth opportunities

Direct investment toward the moments and consumer segments with the greatest potential to grow your brand.

Turn insights into action fast

Get survey results in 4–5 days through a centralized dashboard and short-form memo that equips stakeholders with clear direction on where and how to win.

Learn more