Many Trump Supporters Embrace His New Positions

Campaign postures on a variety of subjects have been abandoned by President Donald Trump as he closes in on his 100th day in office.

Many voters still back his original positions, but when told of his new stances, a new survey by Morning Consult/POLITICO found the president’s supporters are sticking with the Trump train, even as it switches tracks.

The Export-Import Bank

Public opinion about the Export-Import Bank provides the starkest example of this dynamic. Many voters have no opinion about the bank, which provides trade assistance to American companies. Conservative critics have vilified it as corporate welfare, but nearly 4 in 10 voters (38 percent) said they hadn’t heard of it or had no opinion about it.

Another 40 percent expressed a favorable view of Ex-Im when told it “provides credit, insurance, and loans to foreign and domestic companies in an effort to promote U.S. exports,” while 21 percent expressed an unfavorable view.

But when mention of Trump’s commitment to the bank — a departure from his previous stance — was thrown into the mix, many voters who previously said they said they did not have an opinion hopped on board in favor of it. After being told of Trump’s favorable comments, 53 percent of voters said they had a positive view of the bank while just 28 percent said they had no opinion. Two in 10 voters (20 percent) expressed an unfavorable view.

The shift was particularly dramatic among Republicans and Trump’s supporters. Before being asked about Trump, 42 percent of those who said they voted for him expressed a favorable view of the Ex-Im Bank. When those voters were told Trump supports it, opinion shifted 24 points, to 66 percent expressing a favorable opinion.

Americans who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, meanwhile, were less swayed by Trump’s commitment, although their favorable views of the bank rose from 44 percent to 49 percent.

China and Currency Manipulation

A similar thing happened on the prospect of labeling China a currency manipulator, which Trump promised he would do on the campaign trail. Four in 10 Americans said the U.S. should do it, compared with 30 percent who said the U.S. should not because doing so “would lead to a Chinese retaliation that would likely harm many American companies.”

When they were told Trump has said he would not label China a currency manipulator, views flipped: 3 in 10 Americans said the U.S should do so, while 36 percent said it should not. (A third had no opinion.)

Nearly half of Trump’s voters (49 percent) said they thought China should be labeled a currency manipulator. But once they were informed of Trump’s new position, only 36 percent said he should apply the label to China, while those who said the U.S. should not rose from 22 percent to 33 percent.

There was much more deviance among Clinton’s 2016 voters — about a third (31 percent) of them said China should be labeled a currency manipulator, while 42 percent said it should not. But unlike Trump’s supporters, their views hardly changed (28 percent said “should label” vs. 43 percent who said “should not label”) when told of Trump’s position on China.

The national, online survey polled 1,992 registered voters April 13-15 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

 

Update: An earlier version of this story referenced polling on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Due to an editing error, the poll referred to an incorrect name for NATO. That section has been removed.

Briefings

Washington Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

President Donald Trump defended his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., after it was revealed that in June 2016 he met with a Russian lawyer who has ties to the Kremlin. The meeting came after he was led to believe the lawyer would provide damaging information about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and that the information was part of the Russian government’s effort to assist his father’s presidential campaign. The meeting included a Russian-American lawyer who’s a former Russian intelligence officer

Washington Brief: Trump Says He Didn’t Learn of Son’s Meeting With Russian Lawyer Until This Week

President Donald Trump said he did not hear “until a couple of days ago” about a June 2016 meeting between his son, Donald Trump Jr., and a Russian lawyer who might have had damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He also said he spent more than 20 minutes of his two-hour meeting last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin pressing him on election meddling.

Washington Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

The Supreme Court allowed part of President Donald Trump’s travel ban to take effect, while saying the temporary restrictions could not be imposed on people who have a “bona fide relationship” with a person or entity in the United States. Hawaii brought forth a legal challenge that asked a federal judge to clarify whether the Department of Homeland Security violated the Supreme Court’s instructions regarding which family members qualify as having bona fide relationships.

Load More