Garland Looms Large on First Day of Gorsuch Hearings

It may have been the first day of hearings for Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Donald Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, but for Senate Democrats, Monday was as much about another judge – the one President Barack Obama nominated to the vacant seat last year.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the former top Democrat on the committee, said Senate Republicans’ refusal to hold a hearing on Obama’s nominee, Judge Merrick Garland, amounted to a “court un-packing scheme,” one of the “greatest stains” on the committee’s history.

He was joined in his outrage by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), who called the SCOTUS blockade “a historic dereliction of duty, a tactic as cynical as it was irresponsible.”

Despite their bitterness over the Senate GOP’s treatment of Garland, Democrats on the panel suggested they would not obstruct for obstruction’s sake.

“The Democrats on the Senate Judiciary will extend to you a courtesy denied to Judge Garland,” said Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).

As Gorsuch sat through hours of 10-minute opening statements by Senate Judiciary Committee members, some Republicans played defense, looking to distance Gorsuch from Trump and the fractious months-long standoff over Garland’s nomination.

“The nominee before us is not President Trump. It is not Mitch McConnell. It is not Merrick Garland,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.).

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said, “If you believe this has been a great plan to get a Trump nominee on the court, then you had to believe that Trump was going to win to begin with.” The vocal Trump critic added with a laugh, “obviously I didn’t believe that.”

But Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), didn’t deny that the standoff had played into Republicans’ hands on Election Day, when GOP voters pointed to the Supreme Court vacancy as one of their top reasons for supporting Trump.

Cruz praised Trump’s for releasing a list of names during the campaign he would consider appointing to the court for voters to consider. “Issuing such a list was a move without precedent,” he said. “The voters had a direct choice.”

And while Republicans used their opening statements to highlight Gorsuch’s academic and legal resume, Democrats also used their time to paint Gorsuch as a proxy for big business.

Leahy said Gorsuch was “selected by special interest groups” and railed against the “millionaires who funded them.” Franken accused the nominee of “siding with corporations over workers, corporations over consumers, and corporations over women’s health.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said the committee could vote to send Gorsuch’s nomination to the Senate floor as early as April 3, if things stick to schedule. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has threatened to use the “nuclear option” in order to confirm Gorsuch if Democrats choose to filibuster his nomination on the floor.


Washington Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

President Donald Trump defended his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., after it was revealed that in June 2016 he met with a Russian lawyer who has ties to the Kremlin. The meeting came after he was led to believe the lawyer would provide damaging information about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and that the information was part of the Russian government’s effort to assist his father’s presidential campaign. The meeting included a Russian-American lawyer who’s a former Russian intelligence officer

Washington Brief: Trump Says He Didn’t Learn of Son’s Meeting With Russian Lawyer Until This Week

President Donald Trump said he did not hear “until a couple of days ago” about a June 2016 meeting between his son, Donald Trump Jr., and a Russian lawyer who might have had damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He also said he spent more than 20 minutes of his two-hour meeting last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin pressing him on election meddling.

Washington Brief: Week in Review & What’s Ahead

The Supreme Court allowed part of President Donald Trump’s travel ban to take effect, while saying the temporary restrictions could not be imposed on people who have a “bona fide relationship” with a person or entity in the United States. Hawaii brought forth a legal challenge that asked a federal judge to clarify whether the Department of Homeland Security violated the Supreme Court’s instructions regarding which family members qualify as having bona fide relationships.

Load More